<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Photosynth &#8211; Welcome to the Future of Virtual Tours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://point2agentblog.com/2008/09/05/welcometothefutureofvirtualtours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://point2agentblog.com/2008/09/05/welcometothefutureofvirtualtours/</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Software, Chocolate on Top</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris de Jong</title>
		<link>http://point2agentblog.com/2008/09/05/welcometothefutureofvirtualtours/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris de Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agent.point2.com/blog/?p=53#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hi Fred,

Thanks for the insight.  I completely agree with you that Photosynth has a ways to go before it reaches its potential of creating a viable alternative to Flash for media presentation.

Having to navigate away from your destination in order to install a plugin is a deal breaker for most users - no matter how genuinely cool or engaging it may be.

However, I also recognize that an application such as this amounts to nothing more than a proof of concept.  I am sure the powers-that-be in Redmond are already thinking of ways to make the product more transparent and portable.

Perhaps native support for IE8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred,</p>
<p>Thanks for the insight.  I completely agree with you that Photosynth has a ways to go before it reaches its potential of creating a viable alternative to Flash for media presentation.</p>
<p>Having to navigate away from your destination in order to install a plugin is a deal breaker for most users &#8211; no matter how genuinely cool or engaging it may be.</p>
<p>However, I also recognize that an application such as this amounts to nothing more than a proof of concept.  I am sure the powers-that-be in Redmond are already thinking of ways to make the product more transparent and portable.</p>
<p>Perhaps native support for IE8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://point2agentblog.com/2008/09/05/welcometothefutureofvirtualtours/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agent.point2.com/blog/?p=53#comment-39</guid>
		<description>1.  This product REQUIRES you to download a plug in in order to view. Putting up barriers like that is just a bad idea in this day and age.  People won&#039;t do it.
2.  This product is only viewable on a Windows or Vista machine.  You&#039;re now also cutting out all Mac users.  Now eliminating 10% of the people who MIGHT download a plug in.
3.  This product requires a fairly new computer to run.  This also eliminates a whole lot of people using older machines with less horsepower.

It will fail for the same reason video failed for many years.  People will NOT take the time to download a special plug in , install it, THEN navigate back to your site.  Video only became popular when it utilized Flash, which is universal on almost all machines.

It&#039;s a cool product, but it&#039;s a bad marketing idea for real estate. Right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  This product REQUIRES you to download a plug in in order to view. Putting up barriers like that is just a bad idea in this day and age.  People won&#8217;t do it.<br />
2.  This product is only viewable on a Windows or Vista machine.  You&#8217;re now also cutting out all Mac users.  Now eliminating 10% of the people who MIGHT download a plug in.<br />
3.  This product requires a fairly new computer to run.  This also eliminates a whole lot of people using older machines with less horsepower.</p>
<p>It will fail for the same reason video failed for many years.  People will NOT take the time to download a special plug in , install it, THEN navigate back to your site.  Video only became popular when it utilized Flash, which is universal on almost all machines.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a cool product, but it&#8217;s a bad marketing idea for real estate. Right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
